Exhibition of Award-winning Works
February 27-March 7, 2004
Tokyo Metropolitan Museum of Photography, Yebisu Garden Place
February 26, 2004
The Garden Hall, Yebisu Garden Place
August 1-October 20, 2003
Organizer: Japan Media Arts Festival Executive Committee
[Agency for Cultural Affairs / CG-ARTS]
Japan Media Arts Festival Executive Committee
KAWAI Hayao (Commissioner of the Agency for Cultural Affairs)
NAGATA Keiji (Chairman, CG-ARTS)
HAMANO Yasuki (Professor, University of Tokyo Graduate School)
Head of the Jury: KUSAHARA Machiko (Professor, Waseda University)
ITO Toshiharu Ito (Professor, Tokyo National University of Fine Arts & Music)
TOSA Nobumichi (Maywa Denki)
NAKAYA Hide (NHK commentator)
MIKAMI Seiko (Artist / Assitant professor of Tama Art University)
Head of the Jury: NAKAJIMA Shinya (Director of TV Commercials)
ISHIHARA Tsunekazu (Video Game Producer)
KAYAMA Rika (Associate professor, Kobe Design University)
SUZUKI Yu (Video Game Producer)
MIYAZAKI Mitsuhiro (Art Director)
Head of the Jury: TAKAHATA Isao (Animation Film Director)
KAMIMURA Sachiko (Art Director)
HIGUCHI Shinji (Film Director)
MORI Takuya (Film Critic)
YAMAMURA Koji (Animator)
Head of the Jury: SATONAKA Machiko (Manga Artist)
ONO Kosei (Film and Manga Critic)
KIMURA Tadao (President of Nippon Manga Gakuin)
TAKEMIYA Keiko (Manga Artist)
CHIBA Tetsuya (Manga Artist)
Special Achievement Award
Gross National Cool (GNC) is now a hot topic around the world, which argues that the Japanese media arts, specifically centered on pop culture, are contributing to raising the attractiveness of Japan in the world's eyes. On the other hand, it is also common knowledge and a shared view in Japan that the nation is way behind other countries in fostering talent in the field of media arts. Fair and well-known activities recognizing achievements in the media arts serve as a gateway to success for artists and are essential for the development of talent. In this light, the increasing number of applicants to the Japan Media Arts Festival over the past years proves that it is now one of the leading vehicles for recognition representing Japan.
While the Festival's consistent approach of evaluating artwork, irrespective of whether it was created by professional or amateur artists, occasionally led to screening results that were viewed as daring, it has held fast to its initial position of maintaining fairness in evaluations and honoring artists for their outstanding achievement.
The popularity of Japanese pop culture worldwide could be due to its one-sided introduction. Therefore, it seems necessary to clearly define and demonstrate the evaluation axes of Japan in order to further distribute and gain recognition of the excellence of Japanese artwork. In this sense, the screening results of the ACA Media Arts Festival, combined with its efforts to introduce winning works to a global audience, have served to provide clear evaluation bases of Japan, which are now gaining recognition and often referred to overseas. Some of the DVD packages sold overseas specifically state that they contain winning works from the Japan Media Arts Festival.
As part of its incessant pursuit of improvement, the Japan Media Arts Festival has changed its screening process this year so that the process can be more easily understood: The divisions were changed from the past four divisions of interactive and non-interactive digital arts, animation, and manga to arts, entertainment, animation, and manga. As for the screening system, the chief judge was eliminated, and the process was conducted focusing on the chief examiner of each division in accordance with the actual conditions that winning works were selected by each division.
Contrary to our concerns that this change would produce some confusion among applicants, we received more applications this year than in past years. However, it is also true that there were some works that some jury members thought should have been entered in a different division, which posed issues for us to address in the future.
After sitting in on the screening committee meetings, I was impressed by the passion of the jury members to provide fair evaluations of truly outstanding works, the enormous amount of time and effort devoted to the evaluations, and the serious discussions over each selection, as well as by the commitment of the secretariat to accommodate all seemingly impossible requests of the jury members.